The recession that was caused in no small part by the financial crisis shows no sign of nearing an end. If there is a glimmer of light in the UK coming from the end of the tunnel, it might prove to be a very long tunnel.
The latest news from around the world does not create much optimism that we will come out of the recession any time soon.
Unemployment across the single currency Eurozone has reached record highs
Chinese growth appears to be slowing
Managing individual economies has become increasingly complex over the last few decades as international trade and international banking have caused the economic problems of individual nations to reverberate around the world. Historically the international impact would usually be no more than ripples. Foreign exchange rates would then fluctuate and help to provide a local solution by making exports cheaper.
In the world of today the international nature of markets and banks has made the problems more widespread and in turn more severe. With the current fragile state of national economies and international banks the ripples have become waves that threaten to have a knock on impact like a house of cards.
The economists of today have a standard set of tricks up their sleeves. In simple terms, they look at statistical indicators such as employment levels and inflation rates or price indices to gauge how the economy is doing. Based on a belief that the availability of money acts like a tap to stimulate or dampen economic activity, the strategy usually employed is to play with interest rates to encourage or discourage borrowing. With interest rates already having hit rock bottom then money supply must be influenced directly by the Central Bank to stimulate the economy hence quantitative easing.
The coalition came into power with a supposedly unavoidable austerity package. The opposition suggested that they would have handled the situation but it is hard to be certain what they would have done if in power when faced with the reality of the impact of their decisions. If as some believe policy is made by the Civil Service and then wrapped to match the colour of the politicians would their strategy have been that different.
It is important to realise the important since of confidence in the behaviour of markets, particularly financial markets. With every more complex markets, the players in the market place look for ways to make decisions using information provided by specialist information gatherers. Credit ratings re given to all major business to provide an indication of the risk associated with lending money. These credit ratings are also applied to countries. Most countries look to increase their borrowing through the international market place. If the credit rating is poorer then the risk is considered to be higher and so the interest rate, the cost of borrowing money, is higher.
Before the monetarist approach to managing the economy, there was a strong belief that the government should spend money to create jobs that in turn would increase overall disposable income and stimulate the economy. There are at least a couple of weaknesses in this strategy. Firstly, the jobs need to be sustainable employment to have a long term impact. This is much harder to achieve than digging holes and filing them in again. Secondly the increase in spending would create a need to borrow more money. After several years of a flourishing economy, the country should have low borrowing and be in the position to raise funds for growth. However this is not the case.
An alternative way to raise funds is to increase the money flowing into the Teasury through taxation and similar sources. Historically the UK has been a good place to trade though not cheap in tax terms.
This has encouraged tax avoidance which is legal planning within the law to reduce exposure to taxation. This should not be confused with tax evasion which is illegal.
Is it not now time to move away from the Civil Servants and look to find a new understanding of the international play of markets in the 21st Century and the implementation of new approaches to stimulate the economy? This needs to be a worldwide approach with a combined commitment to work.
Showing posts with label monetary policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label monetary policy. Show all posts
Saturday, 1 June 2013
Saturday, 25 May 2013
Time to shake up banking in the UK
The news that the Co-operative bank could be in serious trouble is just the latest indication that the banking model in the UK needs to be shaken up.
Most of the major UK banks needed state support during the financial crisis and the need to separate wholesale or commercial banking from the retail arm has been strongly suggested.
New players in the UK banking sector such as Metrobank and Virgin Money have been set up to provide an alternative to the established banks and are finding a gap in the market.
Metro Bank was Britain’s first new High Street bank in over 100 years. They have stores rather than branches. They say that they offer banking focused on the customer through unparalleled levels of service and convenience. They have what they believe is a unique, customer-focused retail business and are reinventing the rules of retail banking, making every effort to remove all stupid bank rules from their day to day services to offer simpler and more convenient banking to their customers.
The rapid growth of this new breed of banks, shows how far the larger, multi-national banks have moved away from the needs and demands of retail banking.
Like other financial products, such as insurance, the consumer is confused by the complexity of what is being offered making it difficult to compare products and offerings for even the most financially astute.
Without reverting to a barter system, money remains the oil of the machine that is the economy. Imperfections and complexities in the banking system make the smooth running of the economy more problematic regardless of whether you view this from a capitalist, free market or socialist, state intervention perspective.
The core banking system needs to run smoothly. The UK and other countries are trying to use quantitative easing to promote growth because interest rates have already hit rock bottom. However, the banks are now using this extra money to restore there own strength and are lending on a cautious risk averse basis. Some would say too cautiously.
Should this process be in the hands of the corporations driven by profit motives? If the market is operating properly, new players will enter the market to restrict the ability of the existing banks to manipulate the market and make super profits. To a degree as highlighted above this is happening albeit rather slowly.
The problem remains that the complexity of the current banking system makes it difficult for people to understand and obtain or even know what they actually want.
State intervention is required to ensure that the regulators are meeting the needs of the consumer in this market place. The recent financial crisis suggests that the market itself can not work quickly enough to control banking and the regulators across the world have been lagging dangerously behind.
Unfortunately the current trend in regulation is to gain the necessary expertise by utilising the specialist knowledge within the major entities that participate in the sector. This is a dangerous conflict of interest that is repeated in many sectors. To a degree this is inevitable in a world that is ever more complex.
The Bank of England as the UK central bank needs to take a more active role in the market place to work with the regulator to control the excesses of the banks within the UK banking system and to enable the monetary policy to be more effective as a stimulus for the economy.
There must be a clear distinction between retail banking, which needs to be run with a greater degree of social responsibility to protect the individuals forced to use the banking system on a day to day basis and the voracious appetite of the banks to take risks chasing ever increasing profits.
If this is not achievable, then is it time to look at alternatives such as barter systems?
Most of the major UK banks needed state support during the financial crisis and the need to separate wholesale or commercial banking from the retail arm has been strongly suggested.
New players in the UK banking sector such as Metrobank and Virgin Money have been set up to provide an alternative to the established banks and are finding a gap in the market.
Metro Bank was Britain’s first new High Street bank in over 100 years. They have stores rather than branches. They say that they offer banking focused on the customer through unparalleled levels of service and convenience. They have what they believe is a unique, customer-focused retail business and are reinventing the rules of retail banking, making every effort to remove all stupid bank rules from their day to day services to offer simpler and more convenient banking to their customers.
They aim to "exceed the expectations of our customers every day by providing a traditional face to face service in all of our stores with no requirement to book an appointment to discuss your banking needs and card and cheque printers so that you can walk away with everything you need to start using your account immediately".
Virgin Money aims to make everyone better off. Like all Virgin companies, Virgin Money was launched to give customers a better deal. Customers of Virgin Money are presented with lounges that are intended to be about more than money and banking. They are intended to be places where customers can relax and where local communities can come together. Virgin Money's aim is to offer " a wide range of great value financial products that are easy to understand and sort out. In today's busy world our customers tell us it's why they choose to deal with Virgin rather than anyone else."
Like Virgin Money, M&S Bank aims to offer a new style of banking, putting the customer first and providing straightforward financial products with great customer service.
Like other financial products, such as insurance, the consumer is confused by the complexity of what is being offered making it difficult to compare products and offerings for even the most financially astute.
Without reverting to a barter system, money remains the oil of the machine that is the economy. Imperfections and complexities in the banking system make the smooth running of the economy more problematic regardless of whether you view this from a capitalist, free market or socialist, state intervention perspective.
The core banking system needs to run smoothly. The UK and other countries are trying to use quantitative easing to promote growth because interest rates have already hit rock bottom. However, the banks are now using this extra money to restore there own strength and are lending on a cautious risk averse basis. Some would say too cautiously.
Should this process be in the hands of the corporations driven by profit motives? If the market is operating properly, new players will enter the market to restrict the ability of the existing banks to manipulate the market and make super profits. To a degree as highlighted above this is happening albeit rather slowly.
The problem remains that the complexity of the current banking system makes it difficult for people to understand and obtain or even know what they actually want.
State intervention is required to ensure that the regulators are meeting the needs of the consumer in this market place. The recent financial crisis suggests that the market itself can not work quickly enough to control banking and the regulators across the world have been lagging dangerously behind.
Unfortunately the current trend in regulation is to gain the necessary expertise by utilising the specialist knowledge within the major entities that participate in the sector. This is a dangerous conflict of interest that is repeated in many sectors. To a degree this is inevitable in a world that is ever more complex.
The Bank of England as the UK central bank needs to take a more active role in the market place to work with the regulator to control the excesses of the banks within the UK banking system and to enable the monetary policy to be more effective as a stimulus for the economy.
There must be a clear distinction between retail banking, which needs to be run with a greater degree of social responsibility to protect the individuals forced to use the banking system on a day to day basis and the voracious appetite of the banks to take risks chasing ever increasing profits.
If this is not achievable, then is it time to look at alternatives such as barter systems?
Labels:
bank,
Banking,
barter,
co-operative,
consumer,
crisis,
government,
MandS,
Marks,
marks and spencer,
Metro,
monetary policy,
money,
politics,
retail,
virgin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)